On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:09:57PM -0600, Kevin DeKorte wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dave Jones wrote: > > .21 still has quite a few rough edges. The current plan is to move > > straight to .22 for FC6 shortly after it's release. > > I'm assuming you're after the tickless work? Still unsure whether to > > enable that by default as an FC6 update. Perhaps we'll try it for > > the first test update, see what the fallout is like, and if it looks > > scary, compile it in, but off-by-default. > > Ok that is good to know. Just as long as how to enable the tickless > option is documented. > > So what would be the expected fallout from that option being enabled? > Are there things that you know that would definitely break? Timers are pretty fundamental to a working kernel, so it could manifest itself in numerous ways. Right down to 'doesnt boot'. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
