Oh crud....does that mean I have to get into all that compiling my own version of the kernel stuff I have read about? Is it normal for them to compile the kernel with that switch turned off? Thanks! Arch -----Original Message----- From: Jay Cliburn [mailto:jacliburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Mon 5/28/2007 1:41 PM To: Arch Willingham Cc: For testers of Fedora Core development releases Subject: Re: Newest kernel Fedora (2.6.21-1.3194.fc7) killed ndiswrapper Arch Willingham wrote: > Does any of this help? [...] > May 28 12:40:35 localhost kernel: ndiswrapper: Unknown symbol __spin_lock_init > May 28 12:40:35 localhost modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting ndiswrapper (/lib/modules/2.6.21-1.3194.fc7/misc/ndiswrapper.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) [jcliburn@osprey boot]$ grep CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK config-2.6.21-1.*.fc7 config-2.6.21-1.3189.fc7:CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y config-2.6.21-1.3189.fc7:CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y config-2.6.21-1.3194.fc7:# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not set config-2.6.21-1.3194.fc7:CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y The 3194 kernel was built without CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK set (see the above grep command output). CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is required by the exporter of __spin_lock_init. Since ndiswrapper requires __spin_lock_init, it won't run under 3194 because the kernel was built without providing it. Jay -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
