Re: ipw3945 on f7t4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



das wrote:
--- dragoran dragoran <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 5/1/07, Tom London <selinux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 you need a config file call it whatever you want ex: wpa_supplicant.conf ;)
mine looks like this:
ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
ctrl_interface_group=wheel

network={
        ssid="yourssid"
        proto=WPA
        key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
        scan_ssid=1
        pairwise=TKIP
        group=TKIP
        psk="yourpassword"
}

then do (as root)
/sbin/service NetworkManager stop
/usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant -dd -D wext -i wlan0 -c /yoor/configfile.conf
open a second terminal (after it has assiotated) and type (as root)
dhclient wlan0
after this the network should be up and running

*it is indeed!!!*

even for me ;)
thank you for getting all the extra stuff out of the way. hum, what to write bugs for...

i was looking for iwlist pkg owner - so i could go find a debug pkg and get a backtrace.

$ rpm -qf /sbin/iwlist
wireless-tools-28-2.fc7.i386
wireless-tools-28-2.fc7.x86_64

why are both these archs installed? - humm

 314/1352 pkgs are i386 or i686 (3 of which are i686)
 104/1352 pkgs are noarch
 933/1352 pkgs are x86_64

and the last is gpg-pubkey-1ac70ce6-41bebeef.(none)

metacity-devel-2.18.0-2.fc7.i386 - is the only non-duplicate of the i?86 pkgs, for all the others
there is a corresponding x86_64 pkg.

is this news to anyone that there are so many 'duplicate' i386 pkgs on a x86_64 machine?

no this is ok; I asked on IRC they are multilib packages so you have a i386 and a x86_64 one (to be able to run i386 software that links against it)
does the scanning still fails? (segfault)

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux