das wrote:
--- dragoran dragoran <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/1/07, Tom London <selinux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
you need a config file call it whatever you want ex: wpa_supplicant.conf ;)
mine looks like this:
ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
ctrl_interface_group=wheel
network={
ssid="yourssid"
proto=WPA
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
scan_ssid=1
pairwise=TKIP
group=TKIP
psk="yourpassword"
}
then do (as root)
/sbin/service NetworkManager stop
/usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant -dd -D wext -i wlan0 -c /yoor/configfile.conf
open a second terminal (after it has assiotated) and type (as root)
dhclient wlan0
after this the network should be up and running
*it is indeed!!!*
even for me ;)
thank you for getting all the extra stuff out of the way. hum, what to write bugs for...
np ;)
you can also add -B to wpa_supplicant so that it runs in the background
and you don't have to keep the terminal open.
i was looking for iwlist pkg owner - so i could go find a debug pkg and get a backtrace.
$ rpm -qf /sbin/iwlist
wireless-tools-28-2.fc7.i386
wireless-tools-28-2.fc7.x86_64
this is weird.... I am also running x86_64 but I don't have the i386 one
installed.
why are both these archs installed? - humm
314/1352 pkgs are i386 or i686 (3 of which are i686)
104/1352 pkgs are noarch
933/1352 pkgs are x86_64
and the last is gpg-pubkey-1ac70ce6-41bebeef.(none)
metacity-devel-2.18.0-2.fc7.i386 - is the only non-duplicate of the i?86 pkgs, for all the others
there is a corresponding x86_64 pkg.
is this news to anyone that there are so many 'duplicate' i386 pkgs on a x86_64 machine?
how have you installed the system?
fc6 and yum update?
fc6 +anaconda update?
fresh install?
looks like a anaconda/yum bug to me...
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
