Neal Becker wrote:
Jack Tanner wrote:
Neal Becker <ndbecker2 <at> gmail.com> writes:
I've been building xemacs with --xft, because it looks SO much nicer.
Unfortunately, it's also a little buggy. Mainly, it is slow.
I just finished an --with-xft build, since the error that broke the build
yesterday got fixed. Wow, what a difference! Haven't noticed any
particular bugs or slowdowns (so far, at least).
Favorite sexp of the day:
(setq initial-frame-alist
'((font . "Bitstream Vera Sans Mono-8")
))
Here's to a quick merge of the unicode branch and a release speedier than
22...
Which emacs are you guys using? The rawhide version? The gnu svn?
I am using 23 right from the gnu emacs cvs (they are not using svn, at
least not yet anyway...)
See this post for the scripts that I am using to build and run it:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2007-April/msg00470.html
There is a wiki page here as well:
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/XftGnuEmacs
HTH,
Marc Schwartz
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list