On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 09:26 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:05:25AM -0800, Tom London wrote: > > This update 'saved' my /etc/pam.d/gdm in /etc/pam.d/gdm.rpmsave, but > > failed to create a new /etc/pam.d/gdm. This made gdmgreeter very > > unhappy. > > Isn't this, by any chance, yet another hit by yum which in some > circumstances instead of updating a package first removes it, thus > saving various configuration file with an .rpmsave suffix, and > later installs a new version but is careful enough not to clobber > the same configurations which were saved? There were hits of that > with 'initscripts', for example, and this ends up with > /etc/inittab renamed to /etc/inittab.rpmsave, which makes booting > somewhat "inconvenient", :-) and other examples of a less dramatic > nature. > > There was a bug report opened for that but, unfortunately, somehow I > cannot find it right now. Anybody with a reference? One of troubles > is that apparently nobody knows how to reproduce that at will. > I certainly failed when I tried. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196590 -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list