On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:06 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 22:37 -0700, Skunk Worx wrote: > > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 02:51 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > > > >> My question is, will it be possible to find a mid-route, which combines > > >> the shortest possible vulnerability period with a minimal risk of having > > >> DOA machines? > > > > > > What do you think is the "mid-route" for time critical security fixes? > > > > > > > How about a core team of volunteers that yum updates off a private repo > > several hours before it goes public? > > > > The classic solution would be a small farm of automated test machines, > > but I imagine that's a bit too resource intensive for the project right now. Not really. It is just a matter of pushing some buttons, convincing the necessary people and getting it done. > > I'm sure Red Hat has some system for their own testing of RHEL, maybe > for such security fixes it can be used for Fedora? That is one of the things the new Fedora QA lead has to figure out. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006- May/msg00010.html There is a push towards that. Not sure whether automated testing would have detected this particular problem though. Rahul -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list