On 05.05.2006 08:18, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 08:06 +0200, shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote:
I'm not trying to point fingers and/or throw mud.
My question is, will it be possible to find a mid-route, which combines
the shortest possible vulnerability period with a minimal risk of having
DOA machines?
What do you think is the "mid-route" for time critical security fixes?
the mid-route seems to be that there are no longer 2107_FC5 kernels in
fc5 updates or updates-testing.
My question wasn't specific to one particular issue. Obviously this
time, it was a mess up that has been fixed now.
fixed by removing a released/published package in updates ?
sorry.
where is your problem?
-- fedora / redhat internals
==> updates-testing + announcement
-- public testing, (hours, days, weeks)
==> updates + announcement
-- published update
i see no reason why a security update should take a shorter way.
--
shrek-m
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list