On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 08:06 +0200, shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote: > >>I'm not trying to point fingers and/or throw mud. > >>My question is, will it be possible to find a mid-route, which combines > >>the shortest possible vulnerability period with a minimal risk of having > >>DOA machines? You'd agree that having 1000s of DOA machines doesn't > >>really sit well with Fedora's mission statement... > >>(Though, in Dave's defense, a machine that doesn't boot is a machine > >>which cannot be compromised ;)) > >> > >> > >What do you think is the "mid-route" for time critical security fixes? > > > > the mid-route seems to be that there are no longer 2107_FC5 kernels in > fc5 updates or updates-testing. My question wasn't specific to one particular issue. Obviously this time, it was a mess up that has been fixed now. Rahul -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list