Jeff
Was he talking about plugins or extentions that are installed per
user.... that is a completely different issue that updates of firefox
itself.
I'm just a bit confused about your comment about Firefox's internal
update mechanism not being useful. I thought it would be tremendously
useful to a typical user... but disabled by choice in the Fedora-built
Firefox. I'm in the dark, enlighten me?
I've built Firefox in the past but I don't think it's a productive hobby
:) It's so much nicer to have the distro or Mozilla do the hard work.
Then it's a choice of whether Mozilla or Fedora do it better. I thought
a typical user might prefer the updates from Mozilla. So I'm not trying
to devalue package management at the application level, but wondering if
you could make an exception for applications if they do a good job of
managing their own updates _including updates to third party stuff that
Fedora will never support_.
-Cam
--
camilo@xxxxxxxxxxxx <--
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list