On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:28 -0600, John Morris wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 02:23, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > But has anyone at RH tried asking for permission? Including preset repo > > > lines for livna is right out, both legally and morally for the mission > > > of Fedora. But what about the idea of a legal but non-free catagory for > > > Flash, Acrobat, Nvidia, ATI, etc? > > > > what makes you think NVidia and ATI are legal? > > Ok, I'll bite. It's legal until they they get busted. that's a strange world you live in. That's saying that murder is legal until you get caught. That's not the case ... > Which brings me back to my original question. If we accept that some > chunks of closed software are going to remain in most user's machines > for the foreseeable future, how can the process of obtaining these > pieces be simplified. there is a difference. I have no problem with software being closed. At all. I do have a problem with software violating the license on my code. Those are two very distinct cases, at least for me; some people try to make those the same, but they are fundamentally different. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list