Why can't there be a virtual yum repo? IE [Third Party] flash-plugin...rpm -> http://macromedia.mplug.org/rpm/RPMS.macromedia/flash-plugin-7.0.63-1.i386.rpm vmware-player...rpm -> http://download3.vmware.com/software/vmplayer/VMware-player-1.0.1-19317.i386.rpm ...etc This way you are not redistributing it but you are pointing to the original at the vendor's location. Gentoo does something similar but they embed a script that pulls the tarball down and installs it on the user's machine without intervention. This probably needs to go to the Yum group. --Joe -----Original Message----- From: Alan Cox [mailto:alan@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 9:37 AM To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases Subject: Re: Kernel 2059 from Dave Jones fixes nvidia.ko loading On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 06:48:43PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > I'd really like to see them there, too. But the question remains even > > for livna: Is vmware player repackageable and redistributeable? > > since when does livna care about license issues? Since it was created. It just (as a non US organisation) doesn't care about half baked and international treaty violating software patent rules that don't apply in the countries in which it operates. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list