Bill Nottingham wrote:
Philippe Rigault (prigault@xxxxxxxxx) said:
Thank you, Jesse, for the explaination.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:35:06 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:24 -0500, Philippe Rigault wrote:
Sure, only 2442 RPM packages have been rebuilt out of 2442.
Um, no. These were rebuilt before Test3, and the reason why Test3 took
a while because we wanted to get these built FOR test3 so that they
would get TESTING.
I see, I misinterpreted the fact that all packages have a last modification
date of March 6 or after, it is true that most carry the same name as in
test3. Most of them have therefore been touch'ed and not rebuild, right ?
They've been signed.
Does that cause the rpm size difference of 160 bytes larger ?
I wondered why many packages are identical in name, but not identical in
size.
DaveT.
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list