Hi
Nothing directly, I believe the fact that the removing the ability
for someone to have a choice to install everything if they desired to
is the connection to gss and nautilus.
Anaconda was revamped to use yum and this "feature" has not been added
back.
The connection is why are we making software? Is it for the developers
or for the users? Is there any way to come to a middle ground where
both perspectives merge?
Some of the latest changes comparatively resemble going into someone's
house and they have music that you dislike. you might ask them if they
could change the selection. They respond back with it is my house,
radio or a similar comparison. Of course one either departs or argues
a bit more.
Basically, a compromise should make and questions should be proposed
as to how a common resolution can be met middle ground.
Sorry, my thought process for grouping concepts.
Deviating from the original topic requires a new thread. If you are
going on a rant on whether software is designed for users or developers,
atleast do it in a different thread so that people can selectively
ignore it if they dont want to read on that topic.
I believe the fact that metacity does not currently work and did work
slightly before an upgrade with test 3 and its "stabilization" phase
brought out issues with metacity comparative to previous desktop
managers like enlightenment and other capable managers used throughout
at least RHL 5.2 history.
Define "work". It works fine for me.
It is becoming obvious that making a system which is limited in
functionality or reduced user configurability is not possible with
upstream adherence and reduced patches.
Talk to upstream, fork it or use a alternative. Try talking with bug
reports and feature requests since they are specific enough compared to
calling something non working when it does.
--
Rahul
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list