On 2/16/06, Don Springall <don_springall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My point still is that one week for a significant change like > this is not good. Rawhide is more stable now than test 2 but it still does > not feel solid to me. Performance is still not good and gnome feels rather > sluggish at times. So what you want is a pre-deadline deadline. "okay guys next monday is the posted deadline..but really we mean two weeks before that as the real deadline for new features" > > I think we should be concentrating on performance and bug fixes right > now, not new feature testing. Again could they have not waited one > lousy week to try this out ? you seem to want it both ways..... either you want a hard deadline after which no new features are allowed so stablization can happen after that deadline... or you want new features to be able to bleed in post-test3 freeze. Sneaking it in before the deadline is bad... but sneaking it into the tree after the deadline is good? -jef -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list