Re: Crippling Gnome-power-manager, Why!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jonathan Berry <berryja@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Crippling Gnome-power-manager, Why!
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:52:17 -0600

On 2/16/06, Don Springall <don_springall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I can not believe the whole lot of you. Here we are supposed to be polishing > off bugs for release 3 and we are still arguing about what the menu should
> look like and how gpm works.

I don't look at it that way.  We are testing, right?  If something
doesn't work, we report it.  Well, something didn't work (there was no
(easy) way to shutdown) and we reported it.  We tried something new,
and didn't like it.  Perhaps it isn't a bug, per se, but it is
something that could be considered wrong at the least.  Is that not a
part of testing too?

And I have not seen much arguing.  There has been some discussion and
some suggestions made, at least as I see it.

> Was Monday not supposed to be a feature freeze
> ?

I think it was, but I haven't been here long enough to know exactly
what that is supposed to mean :-).

Jonathan
I think we can safefly assume that if someone is suggesting that upstream is smoking bad crack that maybe that is an argument or a flame if you like. My point being there does not seem to be any management of the features being released or the timing of them. They could not wait one more week once test 3 is out the door to start this stuff ? Release 3 has already been delayed once due to gcc 4.1 changes.


--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]