On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:01:38AM +0100, Karsten Fischer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2006, 09:14 -0700 schrieb Michal Jaegermann: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:03:33AM +0100, Karsten Fischer wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2006, 17:04 -0700 schrieb Michal Jaegermann: > > > > > > > > Specific examples, please. Or you have to be kidding. > > > > > > Easily. I put in a media called "Tax2005" and its is mounted > > > on /media/Tax2005, regardless of which drive > > > (DVD-ROM,CD-ROM,DVD/CD-Writer, CD-Writer) I use. > > > > In other words depending on which CD, and in which order you stuck > > in one of your multiple drives (volume labels are far from unique) > > you are looking for your data in different places in a directory > > treee. Extreme consistency indeed. > > Really? I put in the CD "Tax2005" - let me check this, yes - and it is > mounted, every time, on every device, as /media/Tax2005. No, this is clearly false in general. You wrote yourself that you have more than one device where you can put such disk. If you happen to have more that one CD with a volume label "Tax2005", which is far from impossible, and you put another already and now you are sticking the original one into another reader, then it will NOT get mounted under /media/Tax2005. > The problem is to look at the pros and cons > and to find out if the gain outweighs the drawbacks. Which, in this > case, I think it does. How come when you have exactly zero gains and you create a huge mess elsewhere? Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list