On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:30:53AM +0100, Karsten Fischer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2006, 15:22 -0700 schrieb Michal Jaegermann: > > > I still scratch my head what you are gaining by mounting removable > > media at some pseudo-random locations. They are effectively random > > as a volume name is not apparent from a shape of some CD. It may > > even be empty. As it was noted on a desktop you have a label with > > that volume name anyway. > > > > Ease of use in the end, that is the gain, at least from a certain > perspective. Specific examples, please. Or you have to be kidding. > so that I can access the given volume without the knowledge > about on which physical drive it is actually inserted, A name of a mountpoint does not change here anything. If you browse through a desktop you simply do not care. But like you were told before - your music player, and score of other programs you would rather not reconfigure with every media change, may care quite a bit. > Everything else is a bit like Windows, where > everything seems to be around drive C:\ or D:\ and so on. This is a very bad joke again. Right? Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list