2006/2/6, Jim Cornette <fct-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Monday 06 February 2006 07:15, Jim Cornette wrote: > >> I tried out your latest script with the -vw option and it matched > >> anything with kernel within it. > > > > Sorry, all my machines' rpm databases are screwed up in some way and never got > > it to run without complaining. New version below should be fine. > > No problem! My rpm database is in pretty good shape, though I had to > intervene a few time by rpm -qa and going through the whole listing of > packages that I have installed. > > The new version worked as intended. I checked that the packages like > kernel-devel are not matched by kernel. I assume that kernel-smp and its > devel patch would exact match also. > > > >> For test 2, what are you searching for? > > > > When you type "yum update rpm" on an x86_64 machine for example, it does not > > pull in neon for i386, it only grabs the x86_64 package. So, I have > > neon-0.24.7-10.1.i386 and neon-0.25.5-1.x86_64 on my system. This is not the > > way I want my system to be. Both versions should match. > > Thanks for the explanation. I am on i386 and did not know what you were > trying to catch. > > > > -Steve > > > > Jim > > PS - Thanks for the \ to continue lines. There were no problems cutting > and pasting the script into an editor and changing permissions. > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > This thread is quite long. Actually whats yet the best script in terms of considering every yet recognized problem? regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list