2006/1/26, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > On Thursday 26 January 2006 13:33, Robert P. J. Day wrote:> > > > > 2) there is no "cost" or "danger" associated with such a button. > > > given that you would (theoretically) get *exactly* the same effect > > > by just selecting all of the visible boxes that are already there, > > > you simply can't make that argument, so please stop. you're just > > > embarrassing yourself. > > > > Not quite true, there are lots of packages on the CD's/iso's which > > are not in any of the package groups which are selectable. > > but i could have sworn that jef "no, there's only one 'f' there" > spaleta was talking about a reorg of the packages so that *all* > packages ended up in some category. if some packages would still not > be categorized then, yes, my point would not be valid and i would > withdraw it. > > rday > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > Every package should definitely be categorized in my eyes. just my opinion. regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list