On Thu January 26 2006 7:48 am, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 20:03 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > No it doesnt. I made my argument with detailed rationale on why I > > believe it is not useful in general cases. If you disagree with me, feel > > free to do so but I would like to hear a detailed set of use cases that > > make it a convincing enough argument for Anaconda to support it for end > > users apart from Kickstart capability. > > What most people complain about here is AFAICS that we completely > removed (instead of just hid) an option they valued and that was a well > tested (by them), supposedly no-brainer sort of code path, very much > unlikely to give any problems down the road. Granted we have a new > package selector in anaconda now, but I guess adding back the Everything > checkbox and code, perhaps hidden behind an "offereverything" boot > loader option (so we don't scare away unsuspecting types) can't be that > much of an effort. I'd say it would be worth the trouble, because then > we could end this discussion. > I'll add my voice to this chorus - please put the "everything" option back. Put a warning in if you deem it necessary, but don't remove the option. Linux is about choices - let us, the end-users, decide. -- Claude Jones Bluemont, VA, USA -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list