On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 12:11 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > If only there was a way a sane way to track hardware coverage being > actively tested in-house and then later on in the public test2 phase. > A little more transparency as to the variety of hardware thats > participating in the testing phases might headoff some of the more > knee-jerk complaints. But there really isn't a sane way to track all > the hardware variations even if we got system data back from testers > in an automated fashion.. organizing it or mining it would be a pain. > I do believe we're exploring the use of pootypedia: http://pootypedia.sourceforge.net/ -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list