On 1/20/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So while the bug(s) may seem obvious to you, unless your exact hardware > is sitting in my cube it isn't going to seem very obvious to me. I am a > bit hurt at the implication that we don't even bother to test our > release before we send it out the door. We do, and in fact we're > actively seeking to hire somebody to lead our Fedora QA efforts. If only there was a way a sane way to track hardware coverage being actively tested in-house and then later on in the public test2 phase. A little more transparency as to the variety of hardware thats participating in the testing phases might headoff some of the more knee-jerk complaints. But there really isn't a sane way to track all the hardware variations even if we got system data back from testers in an automated fashion.. organizing it or mining it would be a pain. -jef -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list