goemon@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
goemon@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Tom wrote:
Can Fedora install, r/w to existing R_FS partitions?
Yes, but you will need to disable selinux. selinux does not run well
(or really, at all) on anything except ext3 at the moment.
But I have had enough problems with selinux even on ext3 that I
usually install with selinux disabled anyway. Maybe by FC6 all the
selinux issues will be sorted out for production servers :)
Hmm. Does that mean that hundreds of thousands of RHEL 4 systems
running SELinux is just a flick out of my creative imagination?
No it just means that I personally (and others) have issues with FC4
selinux on production servers, and that redhat has sarcastic and
snippy employees.
i'm pretty sure i'm not imagining selinux issues:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=product&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=selinux&field0-0-1=component&type0-0-1=substring&value0-0-1=selinux&field0-0-2=short_desc&type0-0-2=substring&value0-0-2=selinux&field0-0-3=status_whiteboard&type0-0-3=substring&value0-0-3=selinux
Production systems do not mean bug free. If so there are no production
systems at all. Just look at the number of bugs filed against any of the
major components like Kernel, Openoffice.org. Evolution etc and you
would find that bug reports are not by itself a decisive factor. You
also include bugs in NEEDINFO which requires information from the bug
reporter. NEW bugs are unconfirmed ones. MODIFIED ones might require
confirmation from the reporter before being closed. There are invalid
bug reports and feature enhancements as well in there. Nobody claimed
the components are bug free.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list