[pardon me for replying to my own post] On 1/10/06, Chasecreek Systemhouse <chasecreek.systemhouse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A small rant - > > I just spent several hours rebuilding and updating a PPC system; the > dbus-qt dependency still exists and still requires a "rpm -e dbus-qt" > type local fix after a fresh install. > > Also, the SELinux related updates (whichever one contains the > /sbin/restorecon program possibly) is re-enabling SELinux to > enforcing. That action increased update/upgrade time by an hour just > to re-run /sbin/restorecon process. > > After the selinux parts completed A LOT of the rest of the rpms > started having prescript or postscript errors. > > Not a total mess but a little anonying none the less. > > Cheers =) After readint this thread I am almost sorry I posted my rant. I fully understand that Tests are not releases (heck I didn't even use that word in the above post.) However, I must insist that the desired goal of any "burned" ISO - downloadedable from Red Hat's site - should, hopefully, be "working"; in-so-far as to say the code on the CD should work with the other code on the CD. Other than that I have never had any serious issues with Red Hat's ISO's (not since before Red Hat v5 any ways.) I mean it's not like Red Hat has become the Microsoft of the Open Source world, right? ;-) Just joking, really. Sometimes, rarely, I miss the Red Hat Ultrasparc versions -- but those were the good ol' days, huh? I even dug out my old copy of SuSE 7 for the PPC and Ultrasparc cd/book set and wondered if Red Hat was planning on such a Book & CD release again? Maybe one day, when things settle down. -- WC -Sx- Jones | http://ccsh.us/ | Open Source Consulting -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list