On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 09:14 -0500, D Canfield wrote: > Maybe I'll be laughed off the list, but I do think it would be great if > a *goal* (not a requirement) of at least test3 of a given release would > be to upgrade to final. Impossible because some applications may need to be downgraded for final - which can not really be done easily with yum (not w/o using epoch's - but that would be a silly reason to use an epoch) > Might help get a bit more testing on more > diverse hardware if there wasn't the expectation that we will likely > have to re-install a few weeks later. No test release should be used without expectation of re-install. > > Similarly, it would be nice if there were some notes between test > releases (and final) pointing out any changes that might not have been > handled by rpm -Fvh. If updating is done between test releases - it should be done clean install because the installer needs testing, and furthermore, the software should be tested in a clean slate - as that may reveal issues that need to be fixed, and might avoid false issues caused by previous test release. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list