kdeartwork and xscreensaver-extras

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: kdeartwork and xscreensaver-extras
From: n0dalus <n0dalus+redhat@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:48:29 +1030
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: fedora-test-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

Just a quick question:

Is it a bug that the new kdeartwork 3.5.0-2 depends on xscreensaver-extras?

n0dalus.

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora Core 4 Test Update: openoffice.org-2.0.1.1-2.1
Next by Date: [libXScrnSaver] Is “Requires.private” really needed?
Previous by thread: Fedora Core 4 Test Update: cpuspeed-1.2.1-1.24_FC4
Next by thread: [libXScrnSaver] Is “Requires.private” really needed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Photo Sharing] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]