On Dec 21, 2005, Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 17:35 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> > You're still the *only* person I've seen reporting this. >> >> Not true. > Indeed, I missed your report in the middle of another bug. >> It's even been a while since I narrowed the problem I've >> got myself on 5 different boxes to some change in nash. > You have? When? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169059#c47 > If you've actually narrowed it down in some way, please, do tell me > your findings? I did, back on Nov 30. I compared the full contents of a working initrd.img, created with mkinitrd-5.1.10, with those of one created with mkinitrd-5.1.12. The scripts were identical, the device nodes were identical, everything was the same, except for the nash binary. And, as the comment says, that's as far as I got then. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list