> -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-test-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-test-list- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jesse Keating > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:57 PM > To: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Availability FC5 - Test 1 > > On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 10:01 -0500, Will H. Backman wrote: > > Within Redhat I started with control-panel and glint. > > I have progressed through gnome-rpm, gnome-linuxconf, and Update Agent. > > Now I have yum and the system-config-* tools. > > Am I now looking at something called Pup? > > > > I think the tools are getting better all the time, but I think the name > > changes hurt the manageability. > > Would you rather the name stayed the same but not one bit of the old > code be used? None of the old options used, none of the old > documentation relevant, etc etc...? > > Pup is new software. Needs a new name. up2date still exists in RHEL, > and won't be replaced. How confusing would it be to have an up2date in > Fedora that is completely different from the up2date in RHEL? > > Progress means new thinking, new applications, and new names. These are > mentioned in release notes, package lists, mailing lists, blogs, etc... Look at what has been done with mta switching. I just wish similar work was done with the common system tools. Of course wishing gets me nowhere, nor does my complaining about it. I guess I could start working on it. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list