man, 24 10 2005 kl. 06:58 -0700, skrev Tom London: > On 10/23/05, David Nielsen <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > lør, 22 10 2005 kl. 23:00 -0400, skrev Richard Hally: > > > David Nielsen wrote: > > > > I'm currently seeing a rather odd permission problem when SELinux is > > > > enabled, it appears that the initscripts don't have the correct > > > > permissions to create lockfiles (amongst other things I gather). Now I > > > > would love to file a proper bugreport for this but I have no idea where > > > > to start. The filesystem has been properly relabeled and I'm running the > > > > latest targeted policy. > > > > > > > > As the system hangs during boot and the logger can't start because of > > > > permission issues (I think, it doesn't actually complain like iptables > > > > does) I cannot even acquire a decent log describing the nature of this > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > So could someone point me in the right direction? > > > > > > > > Having to set selinux=0 feels so.. dirty. > > > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > David Nielsen > > > > > > > Try enforcing=0 on the boot line, this should allow you to boot and get > > > the messages. > > > > That seemed to really anger X, now it won't even start when SELinux is > > disabled - as far as I can tell it attempts to switch domain context and > > fails. > > > > Is anyone succesfully running current rawhide with the targeted policy > > enabled or is it just my setup that's acting weird? > > > > - David > > Targeted/enforcing works for me (with today's rawhide). > > You sure you're running a completely updated rawhide? Absolutely, installed directly to rawhide Friday from mirrors.dotsrc.org/fedora - kept it up to date with Katz' wonderful new pup graphical updater. - David -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list