On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:19:12AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday 11 October 2005 08:52, seth vidal wrote: > > Maybe I should add a routine where: > > Â if we're on a biarch machine and we're updating a package for one arch, > > check for the biarch package and see if it can be updated too. > > I think that would be helpful. I cannot imagine anyone wanting to keep .i386 > & .x86_64 packages out of sync. It is worse. As I noted before if you will get these packages out of sync and later such "delayed" update for the other architecture will show up then yum will fail to notice that there is some work to be done. So that routine Seth is thinking about most likely should fail the whole transaction if a pair is needed but one is missing. Another possibility - a check for updates should look not only on versions but on architectures too. I do not really know on which level this happens - yum or rpm. Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list