On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 08:23 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 11 October 2005 08:52, seth vidal wrote: > > > Maybe I should add a routine where: > > > if we're on a biarch machine and we're updating a package for one arch, > > > check for the biarch package and see if it can be updated too. > > > > I think that would be helpful. I cannot imagine anyone wanting to keep .i386 > > & .x86_64 packages out of sync. > > Agreed, I think that would go a long way toward solving the problem. > > > Also, over time packages should become 64 bit clean and a .i386 version may no > > longer be required. Is there any way to spot .i386 packages that are no > > longer needed and can be removed? > > That would be nice too. As far as I can tell, though, the real problem > is OpenOffice, which (1) is famously not 64-bit clean, and (2) drags > most of the world along with it - it's not big enough on its own, after > all. I'm really hoping life gets simpler once OOo gets straightened > out. I _really_ like abiword and gnumeric. :) hint hint in extras. extremely actively maintained. :) -sv -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list