On 7/19/05, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:14 -0400, Steve Friedman wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > > > > Robert Nichols wrote: > > >> I find that with firefox-1.0.6-0.1 the Flashblock 1.2.9 extension no > > >> longer recognizes the whitelisted web sites that should be allowed to > > >> load Flash content. The sites are still listed in the Options dialog, > > >> but their Flash content is being blocked. > > > > > > I was able to reproduce this issue using Flashblock 1.2.9. However, please > > > note that 1.3.2 is the latest version of Flashblock, and works fine with the > > > 1.0.6 RPMs as far as I can tell with my testing. I would advise updating to > > > Flashblock 1.3.2. > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback with the RPM! It's very much appreciated. > > > > > > > This is a major gripe that I have with RPM. There is no way for the > > firefox RPM to specify that the Flashblock RPM needs to be upgraded IFF > > flashblock is installed. > > Conflicts: Flashblock < 1.3.2 > Isnt the problem with this that firefox would need to know about flashblock and any other optional packages.. The best I could see is each of the optional packages putting in a Requires: firefox = 1.0.4 to make sure they only are with their working version. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list