Re: Optional Dependent RPMs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:14 -0400, Steve Friedman wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> 
> > Robert Nichols wrote:
> >> I find that with firefox-1.0.6-0.1 the Flashblock 1.2.9 extension no
> >> longer recognizes the whitelisted web sites that should be allowed to
> >> load Flash content.  The sites are still listed in the Options dialog,
> >> but their Flash content is being blocked.
> >
> > I was able to reproduce this issue using Flashblock 1.2.9.  However, please 
> > note that 1.3.2 is the latest version of Flashblock, and works fine with the 
> > 1.0.6 RPMs as far as I can tell with my testing.  I would advise updating to 
> > Flashblock 1.3.2.
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback with the RPM!  It's very much appreciated.
> >
> 
> This is a major gripe that I have with RPM.  There is no way for the 
> firefox RPM to specify that the Flashblock RPM needs to be upgraded IFF 
> flashblock is installed.

Conflicts: Flashblock < 1.3.2

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]