On 7/1/05, Justin Conover <justin.conover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/1/05, Nathan Grennan <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 23:50 -0500, Justin Conover wrote: > > > Did I miss something along the way of running rawhide that it seems > > > that for example firefox.i386 and helixplayer aren't able to install? > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155790 > > > > > > That was closed, but I don't seem to be able to yum install firefox.i386 > > > > I do remember being able to installed i386 packages while using FC4 > > Test releases. I noticed it wasn't the same in FC4. I ended up doing the > > same thing I did with FC3. Setting up duplicate repository files > > in /etc/yum.repos.d. I change the $basearch references to i386 and > > rename the file from fedora.repo to fedora-i386.repo. Then you have to > > use yum install package.x86_64 instead of yum install package. Otherwise > > you will get the i386 and x86_64 versions. > > > > yum --enablerepo=development-i386 install firefox.i386 > <snip> > Installing: > firefox i386 1.0.4-5 development-i386 18 M > Installing for dependencies: > libbonoboui i386 2.8.1-4 development-i386 356 k > libgnome i386 2.10.0-3 development-i386 705 k > libgnomeui i386 2.10.0-1 development-i386 848 k > > > > Thank you, didn't think of that :D > So should this still be considered a BUG or just and added feature. ;) -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list