Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
"not production ready" eg not ready for deployment in ISP production
environment. When people stop filing critical selinux bugs in buzilla then
it will be production ready :-)
Using just the number of bug reports to assert whether something is
production ready or not looks like a bad idea to me. Take a look at the
bug count against any major package like the kernel or xorg for comparison
I'm not using just the number. I'm using the criticality of the bugs. Eg
showstoppers.
Would _you_ seriously deploy FC4T3+selinux in a corporate production
server right now?
good joke :-)
[...] not production ready [...] seriously deploy FCxTx+selinux in a
corporate production [...]
*
*http://www.net-security.org/search.php?sort=0&keyword=selinux&search.x=0&search.y=0
-> http://www.net-security.org/news.php?id=7755
->
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1082560,00.html
<snip>
*"Think before deploying Security-Enhanced Linux in RHEL 4"
*One of the most exciting new features in RHEL v.4 is the implementation
of Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux). In this tip, we'll look at how you
can use it to beef up system security.
</snip>
--
shrek-m