On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 03:04 -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2005, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >I'm not using just the number. I'm using the criticality of the bugs. Eg > > >showstoppers. > > >Would _you_ seriously deploy FC4T3+selinux in a corporate production > > >server right now? > > It wasnt clear to me that you were talking about SELinux specifically in > > the test releases. Test releases by design are not fit for production, > > let alone SELinux in it. Of course I wouldnt suggest doing that > > Ok, would you recommend FC3+selinux in a corporate production environment > then? I'd not recommend FC<anything> in a corporate production environment, I'd recommend RHEL for such environments. (and yes RHEL4 has selinux enabled by default)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part