On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 20:14 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:09:14AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 20:01 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > > So what's the point of that then? If not anybody can file feature > > > requests? > > > > There is an edit list. You have to be known by somebody in the wiki > > already to add you to the edit list. Prevents the bot and medium > > casual spammer. > > Jup. So the hurdle to file something is even higher. Not only do you > need just-another-account-somewhere, you also need to be "known" and > "trusted". > > > > > 2. all good wikis have rollback mechanisms. > > > > > > And who decides what will be rolled back and thus ignored? > > > > Any person with admin access can do a rollback to a previous unpammed > > version. I don't know what you mean by 'thus ignored'. > > People suggested that when people are allowed to file whatever RFEs > they like, those become too many. People said that there is a rollback > mechanism to counter that. I ask who decides what gets rolled back. > > We're not talking about wiping spam, but editorial work. In the form > it is now is just one page with a long list of ideas. > > So, what is now the advantage of just-another-wiki compared to a > full-blown request/bug tracking system, which outweights all the > advantages of that? right now the advantage is that: 1. we have it 2. people use it 3. people like it so since it seems like you don't like it you're invited to NOT USE IT. presto-change-o. -sv