On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:09:14AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 20:01 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > So what's the point of that then? If not anybody can file feature > > requests? > > There is an edit list. You have to be known by somebody in the wiki > already to add you to the edit list. Prevents the bot and medium > casual spammer. Jup. So the hurdle to file something is even higher. Not only do you need just-another-account-somewhere, you also need to be "known" and "trusted". > > > 2. all good wikis have rollback mechanisms. > > > > And who decides what will be rolled back and thus ignored? > > Any person with admin access can do a rollback to a previous unpammed > version. I don't know what you mean by 'thus ignored'. People suggested that when people are allowed to file whatever RFEs they like, those become too many. People said that there is a rollback mechanism to counter that. I ask who decides what gets rolled back. We're not talking about wiping spam, but editorial work. In the form it is now is just one page with a long list of ideas. So, what is now the advantage of just-another-wiki compared to a full-blown request/bug tracking system, which outweights all the advantages of that? Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@xxxxxxxxxx -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0