Darwin H. Webb wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 18:40 -0400, Robert Couture wrote:
On Friday 10 June 2005 18:09, Jim Cornette wrote:
Is this a variable you set in evolution or something you set in the
shell before launching Evolution.?
Is this slowness a result of AV scanners or something? Mozilla mail and
Thunderbird are fairly fast downloading mail compared to Evolution.
Sounds like SpamAssasin in action to me :)
Robert.
Evolution has been getting smother and faster with each update.
The SpamAssain used to open (and keep open) a half dozen processes, now
it opens them when you open the e-mail and closes them when you done.
It only tkes about 3 or 4 seconds to let it settle before clicking
send/receive.
Then it is slow on the first mail because you need to go through the
wire and log on to the ISP mail, after that, the mail comes down steady
and quick, considering it passes through 2 AV, and 3 A-SPam programs
before Evolution gets it. And I only have a Pent III 800.
So don't do anything drastic, without defining what slow really means.
Expectations are so far out in the stars nowadays it's hilarious.
SJ
I setup Evolution on this computer with version evolution-2.2.2-8. I
pasted the CAMEL variable in the shell then launched evolution with the
&> evolution.log added to the command. I didn't have mail in the account
to download. I'll close mozilla, then try checking mail again w/ evolution.
Being that I do not use evolution on a regular basis, I never saw it so
slow. The last time I really used it was with ximian on RHL7.2 or
earlier. It surprised me with the time it took to download mail.
Not to knock evolution. But when something downloads 50 emails and the
progress is taking substantially longer than other mailers, it sticks
out for comment.
Thanks!
Jim
--
This is an air conditioned room -- do not open Windows!