Re: Fortune Program -Moving->RE: Wanda is broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Senthil_OR@xxxxxxxx wrote:
-----Original Message-----
Alan Cox

We don't ship fortune and haven't for some time - Wanda needs reconfiguring



This brings up a very important topic for discussion.
Namely why is Fedora not shipping fortune. Agreed there might be some
licensing issues.
But a program like fortune could be easily written and licensed under
GPL.
And I guess few will be already available.

Just check with the number of .sig quotes in various mailing lists.
There you see the usage of fortune cookie.

It's a useful program and I would like to vote for its inclusion with
Fedora, so that users don't have the trouble to download it separately.
Please provide your suggestions and how can we go about.

Thanks!
Senthil




I'm getting a bit confused to whether Fedora Core and Fedora Extras are as integrated as I thought was the goal. Fedora Extras recieved programs that used to be included in RHL releases and packages that used to be included in Core. There are a lot of great programs in Fedora Extras. I thought that Fedora Extras was an extension to Core.

Anyway, programs that are in core should be revised to not depend on packages in Extras. Using the same scheme that the screensavers use without fortune being installed should be implemented in wanda and other programs. Leaving fortune-mod in Extras is fine with me.

Coming up with another program that does similar things as fortune-mod should not be too hard to do. I believe the political correctness for some of the fortunes and having to battle with offensive to some people sayings was not worth the trouble to maintain the program in core. (RHL)

Jim

--
"Given the choice between accomplishing something and just lying around,
I'd rather lie around.  No contest."
		-- Eric Clapton


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]