Em Sex, 2005-04-22 às 20:35 -0300, Alexandre Strube escreveu: > > > > Nothing else on this line ? > > > > This address should have been decoded. > > > > > > Nothing else. > > Ah, its because its somehow jumped outside the kernel text. > > That's erm, very strange. > > If you grab the boot.iso from the latest development tree, > > is it still happening with the current builds ? > > 1226 is quite old now (2.6.12rc1, there have been 2 rebases > > since then, each of being quite large changesets). Someone asked me to take a picture at the screen. Well, here it is: http://www.surak.eti.br/gallery/2005-04-21/p4220024?full=1 The new boot.iso has a similar result, just the stack trace is bigger. > bad also :-( > > CPU: 0 > EPI: 0060:[<c00f0488>] not tainted vli > eflags: 00010246 (2.6.11-1.1258_FC$) > (...) > Call trace: > pci_bios_find_device > pcibios_sort > pcibios_init > do_initcalls > init > init > kernel_thread_heklper > code (...) > kernel panic - not syncing (...) > panic > do_exit > die > do_page_fault > scrup > set_cursor > vt_console_print > vt_console_print > __call_console_drivers > call_console_drivers > do_page_fault > error_code > get_exec_domain_list > pci_bios_find_device > pcibios_sort > pcibios_init > do_initcalls > init > init > kernel_thread_helper >