On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Sylvain Rouillard wrote: > Maybe the beginning of an explaination... > > [root@localhost log]# locate viapro > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1238_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1238_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1240_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1240_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1258_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro.h > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1234_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1234_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1253_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro.h > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1236_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1236_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1226_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1226_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h > > looks like /viapro/module.h was replaced by viapro.h after 1253. Maybe that > wasn't taken into account when the rpm's were compiled? Just a wild guess. Thinko on my part, fixed in CVS. Will be fixed in the next build. Dave