Re: rest in peace i2c-viapro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maybe the beginning of an explaination...

[root@localhost log]# locate viapro
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1238_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1238_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1240_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1240_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1258_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1234_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1234_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1253_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1236_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1236_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1226_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.11-1.1226_FC4-x86_64/include/config/i2c/viapro/module.h

looks like /viapro/module.h was replaced by viapro.h after 1253. Maybe that 
wasn't taken into account when the rpm's were compiled? Just a wild guess.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]