On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 23:12 +0200, shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote: > and for older bugreports ? > > product=red+hat+linux status=needinfo > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat > +Linux&version=4.2&version=5.0&version=5.1&version=5.2&version=6.0&version=6.1&version=6.2&version=6.2EE&version=6.2J&version=7.0&version=7.0J&version=7.0tc&version=7.1&version=7.1k&version=7.2&version=7.3&version=8.0&version=9&version=GinGin64&bug_status=NEEDINFO&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc= > > sort by ID > > eg. > > first: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18315 > status=needinfo > version=rhl7.0 > last comment on 2000-10-05 03:29 EST > > > last: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122993 > status=needinfo > version=rhl9 > last comment on 2004-05-11 05:00 EST Good point. For anything that isn't RHL 7.3, RHL 9, or FC1+ thats the decision of other people. >From my perspective, if it looks like a security issue, ping a Fedora Legacy fellow to check and see if it's fixed in a newer release. If not, file under legacy. If it's !security, close away. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating