Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 22:56 +0200, shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote:
hi,
could it be possisble to close all no longer maintained rhl/fc bugs ?
thanks.
eg. status new and needinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat
+Linux&version=4.2&version=5.0&version=5.1&version=5.2&version=6.0&version=6.1&version=6.2&version=6.2EE&version=6.2J&version=7.0&version=7.0J&version=7.0tc&version=7.1&version=7.1k&version=7.2&version=7.3&version=8.0&version=9&version=GinGin64&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=NEEDINFO&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=
close them with a nice sentence and all should be ok.
eg.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111615#c5
<snip>
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this
version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug
if the problem
persists.
The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some
older releases,
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the
problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/
</snip>
This is already being handled by the Legacy team. We've set the
majority with needinfo for a period of 2 or so weeks. If no response is
seen in that time, they will be blanket closed.
and for older bugreports ?
product=red+hat+linux status=needinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Linux&version=4.2&version=5.0&version=5.1&version=5.2&version=6.0&version=6.1&version=6.2&version=6.2EE&version=6.2J&version=7.0&version=7.0J&version=7.0tc&version=7.1&version=7.1k&version=7.2&version=7.3&version=8.0&version=9&version=GinGin64&bug_status=NEEDINFO&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=
sort by ID
eg.
first:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18315
status=needinfo
version=rhl7.0
last comment on 2000-10-05 03:29 EST
last:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122993
status=needinfo
version=rhl9
last comment on 2004-05-11 05:00 EST
--
shrek-m