On 4/18/05, Kyrre Ness Sjobak <kyrre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Aha. But still it is "unstandard". Bad. Should just be install -> play. > No more futz. Well.. if you are content with telling me what macromedia.. err i mean adobe "should" be doing with their proprietary closed source products... why stop there? Why not just come out and say they "should" be creating open source products. That solves the whole issue of the need to present users with a click-through agreement. Click through license agreements are a fact of life when using and installing proprietary software. You either do it before you download, or you do it on install, or you do it as part of usage. You can stomp your feet and shake your fist at how bad click-through mechanisms are while sermonizing in front of the choir, but you aren't accomplishing much. However way you would prefer macromedia present its click through license to you, write macromedia about it and convince them. The solution we have now, is a compromise between macromedia's interests and the constraints of the rpm packaging format. If you can get macromedia to agree to allow re-packaging without the click-through mechanisms, please do so. In a world without perfect solutions... I'll take the "bad" of a timeout license window popup over the "bad" of no legally distributable rpm packages for macromedia flash... at least until there is a mature opensource flash implementation to nuture and support. -jef