On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 15:23 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Justin Conover wrote: > > Whats the thoughts on this? > > > > http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=10152 > > > > Looks like Ubuntu is looking into it also. > > > > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287 > > > > Argument for/against thinking this is something to look at in FC? > > > > Cool thing! I would love to see a complete rebuild of FC3 (or 4) and a comparison of the rpm dependencies. > we've looked at this; one of the problems is that this needs to be a per package thing; there are valid setups where --as-needed breaks (eg apps that have plugins can break). Ideally we teach pkg-config about this; but the last time I experimented with that I got bitten by pkg-config being too smart for it's own good and effectively breaking down ;(
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part