Re: --as-needed compile option?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: --as-needed compile option?
From: Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:23:21 +0200
In-reply-to: <a36b7e2a0503301859279b6f23@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>, <mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <a36b7e2a0503301859279b6f23@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0-5 (X11/20050308)

Justin Conover wrote:

Whats the thoughts on this?

http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=10152

Looks like Ubuntu is looking into it also.

http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287

Argument for/against thinking this is something to look at in FC?


Cool thing! I would love to see a complete rebuild of FC3 (or 4) and a comparison of the rpm dependencies.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: --as-needed compile option?
  - From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: --as-needed compile option?
  - From: Justin Conover

References:
- --as-needed compile option?
  - From: Justin Conover

Prev by Date: Re: k3b not able to install with new libFLAC version
Next by Date: Re: --as-needed compile option?
Previous by thread: Re: --as-needed compile option?
Next by thread: Re: --as-needed compile option?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Photo Sharing] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]