Re: mono in fc3/rawhide/4 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



http://www.mono-project.com/about/licensing.html

As far as i can se, the most interesting parts of mono have no patent
troubles. And its all GPL/LGPL/MIT.

So why not? There are a few quite interesting C#/GTK# apps out there
(http://www.gnome.org/projects/beagle/ is one example).

Kyrre

tor, 10.02.2005 kl. 19.07 skrev Paul Iadonisi:
> On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:04 -0600, Justin Conover wrote:
> > Are there any redhat devel's working on mono packages for 4 or in
> > there own /people dir?
> > x86
> > x86_64  <--- Please :)
> > 
> > Or is there a license reason for not having them or more of a
> > time/test reason if they are not some were.
> 
>   License problem, I don't think so.  On the other hand, if you want to
> talk about the wisdom of it strategically or the possible future patent
> problems, well, maybe on another list ;-).
> 
> -- 
> -Paul Iadonisi
>  Senior System Administrator
>  Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist
>  Ever see a penguin fly?  --  Try Linux.
>  GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]